Regionalism and Contemporary Global Issues | Edexcel A-Level Politics
Updated: Sep 29
For Specification 9PL0
Edexcel A-Level Politics | Free Revision Notes
Estimated study time:Â 80 minutes
This Regionalism and contemporary global issues A-Level Politics revision page examines whether regional co-operation can help address conflict, poverty, human rights and environmental problems. Edexcel requires students to consider the ways and extent to which regionalism addresses and resolves these four contemporary issues. The lesson also draws together earlier work on the growth of regionalism, regional governance and the impact of regional co-operation on state sovereignty.  Understanding different regional organisations [Regional organisations] and the EU's international influence [The EU as a regional and global organisation] provides the foundation for this evaluation.
Learning Objectives 🎯
By the end of this revision page, you should be able to:
Explain how regionalism may contribute to addressing conflict, poverty, human rights and environmental problems.
Analyse how economic, political and security forms of regionalism relate to different global issues.
Explain how state sovereignty can limit regional governance.
Compare regional approaches with wider forms of global governance.
Apply realist and liberal perspectives to regional cooperation.
Evaluate the extent to which regionalism can address contemporary global issues.
Revision Notes đź“š
What does the specification require?
Edexcel requires students to study:
the ways and extent to which regionalism addresses and resolves contemporary global issues involving conflict, poverty, human rights and the environment.
This wording matters.
You are not only expected to explain what regional organisations do. You must be able to evaluate:
how regionalism could help address each issue
what limits regional organisations face
whether regional action can actually resolve an issue rather than merely respond to it
how regionalism interacts with sovereign states and global institutions
The course plan therefore asks you to examine obstacles to regional governance, analyse how regionalism affects state sovereignty, and assess how far regionalism addresses conflict, poverty, human rights and environmental problems.
Regionalism as a level of governance
Regionalism operates between the national and global levels.
A simplified model is:
state → regional organisation → global governance
Regional organisations bring neighbouring or geographically connected states into structures for collective action.
Earlier in the course, regionalism is divided into:
economic regionalism
security regionalism
political regionalismÂ
These three forms are especially useful when analysing contemporary global issues.
Global issue | Most directly relevant forms of regionalism |
Conflict | Security and political regionalism |
Poverty | Economic and political regionalism |
Human rights | Political regionalism |
Environment | Political and economic regionalism |
These categories can overlap. A regional organisation may address several types of problem at the same time.
Why regional action may matter
Conflict, poverty, human rights and environmental problems frequently extend beyond the boundaries of one state.
The Global Politics specification emphasises increasing interconnectedness and interdependence, alongside challenges to complete state control.
Regionalism can therefore provide a level of cooperation larger than the individual state but more geographically concentrated than worldwide institutions.
The basic argument is:
cross-border issue → individual states may struggle to act alone → regional cooperation creates collective capacity
However, collective capacity is not the same as guaranteed success.
Whether regional organisations can act effectively depends partly on the authority that states are willing to exercise collectively.
Regionalism and conflict
The specification identifies security regionalism as one of the forms regionalism can take.
This creates a direct connection between regionalism and conflict.
How regionalism may address conflict
Regional cooperation can provide a framework through which states can:
coordinate responses to security problems
discuss regional disputes
pursue collective approaches rather than unilateral action
develop common political positions
use regional governance to manage problems involving several states
The important analytical idea is that conflict in one state or between neighbouring states may affect the surrounding region.
Security regionalism therefore attempts to replace isolated national responses with some form of collective action.
This connects closely with earlier study of collective security and military cooperation [NATO].
Political regionalism and conflict
Conflict is not only a military problem.
Political regionalism may allow states to cooperate through common institutions and negotiated regional arrangements.
This produces another possible chain:
political dialogue → cooperation → management of disagreements → reduced likelihood or impact of conflict
However, the specification requires evaluation rather than an assumption that cooperation will always work.
Limits of regionalism in addressing conflict
The main conceptual limitation is sovereignty.
Edexcel defines sovereignty as absolute and unlimited power and authority. Regional organisations operate in a system in which states continue to possess sovereignty.
Where decision making is intergovernmental, states cooperate while retaining sovereign independence.
This creates a tension:
effective collective action may require states to accept common decisions
but
states may wish to retain control over their own security and foreign policy
Regional organisations may therefore provide mechanisms for cooperation without possessing unlimited independent power to impose solutions.
This tension is particularly important when comparing supranational and intergovernmental approaches [The EU as a regional and global organisation].
Conflict: arguments to evaluate
Why regionalism may help | Why its impact may be limited |
Security problems can be addressed collectively | Sovereign states retain important powers |
Regional states may create common institutions | Intergovernmental action depends on state cooperation |
Political regionalism provides mechanisms for dialogue | Regional governance is not the same as world government |
Collective responses may give states greater capacity | Regional organisations may lack authority above their members |
A strong answer should therefore distinguish between addressing conflict and completely resolving it.
Regionalism may provide tools for cooperation without eliminating the underlying causes of conflict.
Regionalism and poverty
Poverty is the second contemporary global issue specified by Edexcel.
This connects particularly strongly with economic regionalism.
The specification requires students to understand economic regionalism as one of the main forms taken by regional cooperation.
How economic regionalism may address poverty
Regional economic cooperation can create a framework in which states coordinate economic activity.
At a conceptual level, regionalism may therefore contribute to addressing poverty through:
economic cooperation
coordination between neighbouring states
collective regional economic policies
increased economic interconnectedness
The central analytical argument is:
poverty has economic dimensions → economic regionalism increases cooperation → collective economic action may contribute to attempts to reduce poverty
The specification does not provide a prescribed regional case study demonstrating a particular poverty-reduction outcome, so students should not invent one.
Poverty itself is studied in much greater depth through global economic governance and development [Global economic governance and poverty].
Regional action compared with global economic governance
Regionalism is not the only way states attempt to address poverty.
The specification separately requires study of:
the International Monetary Fund
the World Bank
the World Trade Organization
the G7/G8
the G20
different approaches to poverty and development
This allows comparison between:
regional economic governance
and
global economic governance
A useful exam argument is therefore that regional organisations form one layer of governance, rather than replacing global institutions.
Limits of regional approaches to poverty
Again, state sovereignty matters.
Regional economic cooperation requires governments to agree to collective arrangements.
The degree of cooperation may vary depending on whether regionalism remains intergovernmental or becomes more supranational.
There is also an important conceptual limitation:
Regionalism is geographically bounded.
A regional organisation may coordinate states within one region, whereas poverty is also a global issue involving relationships across regions.
This means a regional response may contribute to wider action without necessarily providing a complete global solution.
Poverty: arguments to evaluate
Why regionalism may help | Why its impact may be limited |
Economic regionalism enables collective economic cooperation | Poverty extends beyond individual regions |
Regional institutions can coordinate participating states | National governments retain significant authority |
Regional action may complement global governance | Global institutions also address poverty |
Cooperation may increase collective capacity | Regional integration varies considerably in depth |
Students should therefore avoid writing that economic regionalism automatically eliminates poverty.
The question is one of extent.
Regionalism and human rights
Human rights are another specified contemporary global issue.
Edexcel defines human rights elsewhere in Global Politics as rights people possess by virtue of being human, while universal human rights apply regardless of cultural or other differences.
Regionalism may affect human rights mainly through political regionalism and regional governance.
How regional governance may contribute
Political regionalism creates institutions through which states can develop collective rules, expectations and political cooperation.
In principle, regional governance may therefore provide:
political structures through which rights issues can be discussed
common regional frameworks
mechanisms for cooperation between governments
an additional level of governance between the state and global institutions
The detailed international law and institutional mechanisms for protecting human rights are covered separately in international human-rights institutions [International human-rights law and institutions].
Human rights and sovereignty
Human-rights protection creates a particularly clear sovereignty problem.
If sovereignty means ultimate state authority, external or regional standards may constrain what governments can do within their own territories.
The relationship can therefore be represented as:
universal or collective rights standards ↔ state sovereignty
This is a wider issue studied directly in human-rights protection and sovereignty [Human rights and state sovereignty].
Regionalism adds another layer to the debate.
A regional institution may attempt to establish common standards, while governments remain sovereign political actors.
Why regional human-rights governance may be limited
The same institutional distinction matters again:
Supranational regionalism
Regional institutions may possess greater independent authority.
Intergovernmental regionalism
Implementation remains more dependent on individual governments.
The deeper the regional governance structure, the greater its potential capacity to constrain state action.
However, deeper regional authority can itself produce greater sovereignty concerns.
This creates an important tension:
stronger regional governance may increase collective capacity but place greater limits on national autonomy.
Human rights: arguments to evaluate
Why regionalism may help | Why its impact may be limited |
Regional institutions can create common political frameworks | States remain sovereign |
Cooperation may reinforce collective expectations | Authority differs greatly between regional organisations |
Regional governance adds another level of rights protection | Intergovernmental systems depend heavily on member states |
States may act collectively rather than separately | Regional standards do not automatically resolve rights abuses |
This issue shows why regionalism and sovereignty cannot be studied separately.
Regionalism and the environment
Environmental problems form the fourth contemporary issue identified by Edexcel.
Environmental politics is especially suited to cooperative analysis because the wider specification identifies:
the global commons
the tragedy of the commons
sustainable development
global environmental governance
difficulties caused by state sovereignty
The dedicated environmental unit should therefore be revised alongside this lesson through global environmental governance [Global environmental governance].
How regionalism may address environmental problems
Environmental issues can cross national borders.
Regional governance can therefore provide a framework for:
cooperation between neighbouring states
political coordination
collective environmental agreements
economic coordination where environmental policy affects economic activity
Regionalism may operate between purely national action and global environmental agreements.
The basic mechanism is:
shared environmental problem → need for cooperation → regional coordination → collective response
This mirrors the broader Global Politics principle that interconnected issues may require cooperation beyond the individual state.
The environment and the tragedy of the commons
The specification defines the tragedy of the commons as a situation in which individual users acting according to their own interests damage a shared resource contrary to the common good.
Regional governance may be relevant because it provides a mechanism through which states can coordinate their behaviour rather than acting entirely independently.
However, the same problem can reappear at regional level.
If sovereign states prioritise their own immediate interests, collective environmental action may remain difficult.
Regionalism therefore does not automatically remove the collective-action problem.
Environmental governance and sovereignty
The wider environmental specification explicitly identifies sovereignty as an obstacle to international environmental cooperation.
The same logic can apply to regional governance:
effective collective environmental rules → some restriction on independent state choices
This means environmental regionalism again involves balancing:
national autonomy
collective regional action
Students should compare this with wider obstacles to environmental cooperation [Obstacles and non-state actors].
Environment: arguments to evaluate
Why regionalism may help | Why its impact may be limited |
Environmental problems may cross state borders | States retain sovereignty |
Regional institutions can coordinate neighbouring states | Environmental problems can also be global rather than regional |
Collective rules may reduce purely national responses | Cooperation depends on the depth of regional governance |
Regionalism can complement global agreements | Regional action alone may not resolve worldwide environmental problems |
Again, distinguish contribution from complete resolution.
Comparing the four contemporary global issues
A useful revision framework is to ask the same four questions for each issue.
Issue | Relevant form of regionalism | How regionalism may contribute | Central limitation |
Conflict | Security and political | Collective responses and regional political cooperation | Sovereignty and dependence on member states |
Poverty | Economic and political | Regional economic cooperation and coordination | Regional scope and continuing national authority |
Human rights | Political | Common political frameworks and regional governance | Tension with state sovereignty |
Environment | Political and economic | Coordination over problems crossing state borders | Sovereignty and wider global scale of environmental problems |
The analytical pattern is remarkably consistent:
collective problem → regional cooperation → increased capacity → sovereignty constraint → uncertain effectiveness
That is the core debate of the lesson.
Regional governance and state sovereignty
State sovereignty is central to all four issues.
The specification explicitly requires students to study the impact of regionalism on state sovereignty alongside the prospects for regional governance.
Regionalism can apparently weaken sovereignty because states accept common arrangements.
However, regional cooperation can also give states greater collective capacity.
This creates two competing interpretations.
Regionalism constrains sovereignty
States may become less able to act entirely independently where they accept:
common rules
collective decision making
regional institutions
supranational authority
The more developed the regional organisation, the greater the possible constraint.
Regionalism may increase effective state power
Alternatively, states may cooperate regionally because acting together gives them more capacity to tackle problems that are difficult to manage individually.
This produces an important distinction:
formal independence is not necessarily the same as effective political capacity.
The specification requires students to evaluate these competing relationships rather than treating sovereignty as simply present or absent.
Supranationalism and regional effectiveness
Edexcel defines supranationalism as placing substantial authority at a level theoretically above the state.
A supranational regional organisation may have greater capacity to establish and implement common policies.
This could make regional governance more capable of addressing:
conflict
poverty
human-rights issues
environmental problems
However, greater supranational authority also places more direct constraints on state sovereignty.
This creates a trade-off:
greater collective authority ↔ greater constraint on individual states
Intergovernmentalism and regional effectiveness
Edexcel defines intergovernmentalism as interaction among states based on sovereign independence.
This protects national sovereignty more strongly.
However, collective action remains more dependent on agreement between governments.
The contrast can therefore be summarised as:
Supranational approach | Intergovernmental approach |
More authority at regional level | More authority retained by states |
Potentially stronger collective institutions | Stronger protection of sovereignty |
Greater potential to bind members | Action depends more heavily on government agreement |
May improve collective capacity | May restrict independent regional action |
Neither arrangement automatically guarantees success.
Regionalism compared with global governance
Regionalism and global governance should not be treated as opposites.
They are different levels at which states and other actors cooperate.
For example, the specification separately examines global institutions concerned with:
political and security governance
economic governance
human rights
environmental governance
Regional organisations can therefore:
complement global institutions
act within particular geographical areas
provide additional mechanisms for cooperation
sometimes create deeper integration among a smaller group of states
The key comparison is regional depth versus global reach.
Regional arrangements may sometimes achieve deeper cooperation among fewer states.
Global arrangements can involve a much wider geographical range but may face greater difficulty securing agreement.
The EU as the most developed regional case in the specification
The specification devotes particular attention to the European Union, including:
European integration
Economic and Monetary Union
supranationalism
intergovernmentalism
political influence
economic influence
structural influence
military influence
This makes the EU especially useful when thinking about what deeper regional governance can look like.
However, you should not assume that all forms of regionalism operate like the EU.
The specification separately requires study of NAFTA, the African Union, Arab League and ASEAN, demonstrating that regional cooperation exists in different forms.
You should therefore use knowledge from different regional organisations [Regional organisations] to avoid treating regionalism as one uniform model.
Applying liberalism
The specification states that liberalism and realism should be applied across Global Politics.
A liberal interpretation gives greater emphasis to:
possibilities for cooperation
complex interdependence
international organisations
global governance
Regional organisations therefore fit naturally with the liberal argument that states can cooperate through institutions rather than relying exclusively on independent national action.
Applied to contemporary global issues:
interdependence → shared problems → institutions → cooperation
Regionalism can therefore be seen as evidence that states can organise collective responses to transnational problems.
For more detail, revise liberal explanations of global politics [Liberalism].
Applying realism
Realism places greater emphasis on:
states
power
international anarchy
security
competition
From this perspective, regional institutions continue to operate in a world of sovereign states.
Regional cooperation does not remove the importance of national power and national sovereignty.
A realist analysis may therefore emphasise that regional organisations depend ultimately on the states that participate in them.
Applied to contemporary issues:
states remain sovereign → regional organisations have limited independent authority → national interests and power remain central
This perspective links directly with realist approaches to global politics [Realism].
Liberalism and realism compared
Liberal interpretation | Realist interpretation |
Regional cooperation demonstrates the possibility of institutional cooperation | States remain the primary actors |
Interdependence makes collective action necessary | Sovereignty limits regional authority |
Institutions can help states address shared problems | Regional institutions cannot remove international anarchy |
Regional governance may increase cooperation | Cooperation remains shaped by state power |
A 30-mark question may reward your ability to connect regionalism with these wider theoretical perspectives, provided you remain focused on the wording of the question.
Does regionalism resolve global problems?
The word resolve sets a higher standard than address.
A regional organisation may:
recognise a problem
coordinate policy
provide institutions
create rules
organise collective action
without eliminating the problem entirely.
When evaluating effectiveness, therefore distinguish:
Addressing an issue
Taking meaningful collective action towards it.
Resolving an issue
Removing or overcoming the underlying problem.
This distinction is particularly useful for conflict, poverty, human rights and environmental questions because these issues may involve causes and actors extending beyond any one region.
A framework for evaluation
When evaluating regionalism, ask four questions.
1. Capacity
Does the regional organisation possess sufficient political, economic, structural or security capacity?
2. Authority
Are decisions supranational or dependent on agreement between sovereign governments?
3. Scale
Is the problem mainly regional, or does it require genuinely global cooperation?
4. Outcome
Has regionalism created mechanisms for action, or can it be shown to have resolved the issue?
The provided specification does not give prescribed detailed case-study outcomes for each of the four issues. Students should therefore avoid inventing factual examples and should use supported material from the other Global Politics content areas when developing examination evidence.
Key Words 🔑
Key word | Student-friendly definition | How it may be used in an exam |
Regionalism | The creation and implementation of institutions expressing a particular identity and shaping collective action within a geographical region. | Use when explaining why states cooperate regionally over shared problems. |
Sovereignty | Absolute and unlimited power and authority. | Use when analysing why regional governance may be constrained by member states. |
Supranationalism | Giving substantial power to an authority theoretically placed above the state. | Use when explaining how deeper regional governance may increase collective authority. |
Intergovernmentalism | Interaction among states based on sovereign independence. | Use when explaining why regional action may remain dependent on national governments. |
Global actor | An entity that participates or acts in international relations. | Use when assessing whether a regional organisation can influence issues beyond its own region. |
These terms form part of Edexcel's specified terminology for Regionalism and the EU.
Common Mistakes ⚠️
Mistake: Treating regionalism as automatically successful
Why this is incorrect:
The specification explicitly asks students to assess the ways and extent to which regionalism addresses and resolves global issues. This requires evaluation rather than an assumption of success.
How to improve:
For every claimed strength, identify a possible limitation connected to sovereignty, institutional authority or the scale of the issue.
Mistake: Discussing only the European Union
Why this is incorrect:
The specification also names NAFTA, the African Union, Arab League and ASEAN as regional organisations.
How to improve:
Use the EU when its deeper integration is relevant, but remember that regionalism takes different forms.
Mistake: Confusing regional organisations with global organisations
Why this is incorrect:
Regionalism is organised around collective action within a geographical region. Global institutions operate at a wider international level.
How to improve:
Ask whether the institution you are discussing is being used as evidence of regional governance or global governance.
Mistake: Ignoring state sovereignty
Why this is incorrect:
The impact of regionalism on sovereignty is an explicit part of the specification and is central to understanding limits on regional governance.
How to improve:
Include a sovereignty link in every major evaluation:
regional cooperation → common action → possible constraint on independent state authority
Mistake: Treating all four global issues in exactly the same way
Why this is incorrect:
Different forms of regionalism are relevant to different problems.
How to improve:
Match the issue to the mechanism:
conflict → security and political regionalism
poverty → economic regionalism
human rights → political regionalism
environment → political and economic cooperation
Mistake: Treating "address" and "resolve" as synonyms
Why this is incorrect:
A regional organisation may contribute to tackling a problem without completely eliminating it.
How to improve:
Use careful evaluative language such as:
contributes to
provides a mechanism for
may constrain
may help address
does not necessarily resolve
Mistake: Assuming greater supranationalism is automatically more effective
Why this is incorrect:
Greater supranational authority may increase regional capacity, but it also creates greater tension with state sovereignty.
How to improve:
Explain the trade-off between collective authority and national autonomy rather than assuming one institutional model is always preferable.
Exam-Style Questions ✍️
Question 1
Examine the ways in which regionalism may contribute to addressing conflict.
(12)
Indicative mark scheme
AO1 knowledge and understanding may include:
Security is one of the specified forms of regionalism.
Political regionalism can also provide collective institutions.
Regional governance creates mechanisms for cooperation between states.
State sovereignty remains significant.
Intergovernmentalism involves cooperation between sovereign states.
AO2 analysis may include:
Security cooperation can increase collective capacity to respond to regional conflict.
Political institutions may provide mechanisms for managing shared problems.
Effectiveness may nevertheless depend on the willingness of states to act collectively.
Sovereignty therefore both enables regional cooperation through state participation and constrains independent regional authority.
Question 2
Examine the differences between the ways regionalism may address poverty and human-rights problems.
(12)
Indicative mark scheme
AO1 knowledge and understanding may include:
Economic regionalism is particularly relevant to poverty.
Political regionalism is particularly relevant to human rights.
Regional organisations provide structures for collective action.
Human-rights governance may create tensions with sovereignty.
Poverty is also addressed through global economic governance.
AO2 analysis may include:
Poverty involves economic cooperation and development, whereas human-rights issues more directly involve political rules and state authority.
Economic regionalism may coordinate states without requiring the same direct constraint on domestic authority as some rights arrangements.
Both nevertheless depend on cooperation between states and may be limited by the geographical scope of regional organisations.
Question 3
Examine the ways in which state sovereignty may limit regional attempts to address environmental problems.
(12)
Indicative mark scheme
AO1 knowledge and understanding may include:
Sovereignty means absolute and unlimited power and authority.
Environmental problems can require cooperation beyond individual states.
The specification identifies sovereignty as an obstacle to environmental cooperation.
Intergovernmentalism preserves sovereign independence.
Supranationalism places greater authority above states.
AO2 analysis may include:
States may resist common environmental arrangements if these limit independent decision making.
Intergovernmental cooperation may therefore depend on continued agreement between governments.
More supranational authority could strengthen collective action but would impose greater constraints on state autonomy.
Regionalism therefore exposes a tension between effective environmental governance and sovereignty.
Question 4
Examine the differences between regional and global approaches to contemporary global issues.
(12)
Indicative mark scheme
AO1 knowledge and understanding may include:
Regionalism operates within geographical regions.
Global governance operates internationally.
Regional organisations include NAFTA, the AU, Arab League, ASEAN and the EU.
Global governance includes political, economic, human-rights and environmental institutions.
Both involve cooperation beyond the individual state.
AO2 analysis may include:
Regional governance may involve fewer states and potentially deeper cooperation.
Global governance has wider geographical reach.
Regional approaches may be better suited to issues concentrated within a particular region.
Global problems may require cooperation extending beyond regional boundaries.
Regional and global governance can therefore complement rather than simply replace one another.
Question 5
Evaluate the view that state sovereignty is the main obstacle preventing regionalism from resolving contemporary global issues.
(30)
Indicative mark scheme
Arguments supporting the view may include:
Regional organisations are composed of sovereign states.
Intergovernmentalism preserves sovereign independence.
Collective action may therefore depend on agreement between governments.
Human-rights and environmental governance may directly constrain national autonomy.
Security cooperation may also involve areas traditionally controlled by states.
Alternative arguments may include:
Regionalism can allow states to increase their collective capacity.
Supranational structures can provide stronger regional authority where states agree to them.
Some problems extend beyond the geographical reach of any regional organisation.
Conflict, poverty, human rights and environmental problems have different causes and may require different institutions.
Global governance may still be required alongside regional action.
AO3:
Students should compare sovereignty with other limitations rather than assuming it explains every weakness. A substantiated conclusion should identify the criteria being used to judge the effectiveness of regional governance.
Question 6
Evaluate the view that regionalism is more effective in addressing conflict than poverty.
(30)
Indicative mark scheme
Evidence relating to conflict may include:
Security regionalism provides a direct mechanism for cooperation.
Political regionalism can create regional institutions for collective action.
States affected by the same regional security problems may have incentives to cooperate.
Regional approaches may concentrate action within the area directly affected.
Limitations concerning conflict may include:
Sovereignty constrains regional authority.
Security decisions may remain intergovernmental.
Regional cooperation does not necessarily remove the causes of conflict.
Evidence relating to poverty may include:
Economic regionalism provides a framework for collective economic cooperation.
Regional economic action may complement global economic governance.
Collective economic structures may increase regional capacity.
Limitations concerning poverty may include:
Poverty is not confined neatly within regional boundaries.
Wider global economic structures also matter.
Regional cooperation does not by itself guarantee poverty reduction.
AO3:
Students should establish what "effective" means and compare the capacity of regionalism to address each problem separately. The conclusion should arise from the evidence rather than selecting a predetermined winner.
Question 7
Evaluate the view that regional organisations are more effective when they are supranational rather than intergovernmental.
(30)
Indicative mark scheme
Arguments favouring supranationalism may include:
Greater authority can allow common decisions to be implemented more consistently.
Regional institutions may be less dependent on repeated agreement between national governments.
Stronger common institutions may increase the capacity to address shared problems.
Supranationalism may therefore deepen regional governance.
Alternative arguments may include:
Supranationalism restricts state sovereignty.
States may prefer intergovernmental cooperation because it preserves national control.
Intergovernmental arrangements can still provide meaningful collective action.
Different issues may require different degrees of integration.
Effectiveness cannot be measured solely by institutional centralisation.
AO3:
Students should evaluate the trade-off between collective capacity and national sovereignty. A substantiated judgement should distinguish institutional strength from actual success in addressing global issues.
Question 8
Evaluate the view that regionalism can address contemporary global issues but cannot resolve them.
(30)
Indicative mark scheme
Arguments supporting the view may include:
Regional organisations provide institutions for cooperation.
Security, economic and political regionalism can contribute to collective responses.
Regional governance can coordinate state action.
However, contemporary issues frequently extend beyond a single geographical region.
Sovereign states continue to retain substantial authority.
Regional institutions therefore may contribute without completely removing underlying problems.
Alternative arguments may include:
Deeper regional governance can produce significant collective authority.
Supranational arrangements may allow regional institutions to operate beyond simple voluntary coordination.
Regional cooperation may provide more focused responses than wider global institutions.
Regional organisations can form part of broader networks of global governance.
AO3:
Students should distinguish carefully between addressing, managing and resolving an issue. Conclusions should assess conflict, poverty, human rights and environmental problems separately before drawing an overall judgement.
Comments